ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Vascular Claudication-Assessment for Revascularization.

نویسندگان

  • Osmanuddin Ahmed
  • Michael Hanley
  • Shelby J Bennett
  • Ankur Chandra
  • Benoit Desjardins
  • Kenneth L Gage
  • Marie D Gerhard-Herman
  • Michael Ginsburg
  • Heather L Gornik
  • Isabel B Oliva
  • Michael L Steigner
  • Richard Strax
  • Nupur Verma
  • Frank J Rybicki
  • Karin E Dill
چکیده

Vascular claudication is a symptom complex characterized by reproducible pain and weakness in an active muscle group due to peripheral arterial disease. Noninvasive hemodynamic tests such as the ankle brachial index, toe brachial index, segmental pressures, and pulse volume recordings are considered the first imaging modalities necessary to reliably establish the presence and severity of arterial obstructions. Vascular imaging is consequently used for diagnosing individual lesions and triaging patients for medical, percutaneous, or surgical intervention. Catheter angiography remains the reference standard for imaging the peripheral arteries, providing a dynamic and accurate depiction of the peripheral arteries. It is particularly useful when endovascular intervention is anticipated. When combined with noninvasive hemodynamic tests, however, noninvasive imaging, including ultrasound, CT angiography, and MR angiography, can also reliably confirm or exclude the presence of peripheral arterial disease. All modalities, however, have their own technical limitations when classifying the location, extent, and severity of disease. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Recurrent Symptoms following Lower-extremity Angioplasty

ACR Appropriateness Criteria 1 Recurrent Symptoms–Lower-Extremity Angioplasty American College of Radiology ACR Appropriateness Criteria Clinical Condition: Recurrent Symptoms Following Lower-Extremity Angioplasty Variant 1: Claudication. Radiologic Procedure Rating Comments RRL* Segmental Doppler pressures and pulse volume recordings 9 Usual first tests. O MRA lower extremity without and with ...

متن کامل

Assessment of Fetal Well-being

ACR Appropriateness Criteria 1 Assessment of Fetal Well-Being American College of Radiology ACR Appropriateness Criteria Clinical Condition: Assessment of Fetal Well-Being Variant 1: Low-risk pregnancy. Radiologic Procedure Rating Comments RRL* US pregnant uterus biophysical profile 2 O US pregnant uterus modified biophysical profile 2 O US duplex Doppler velocimetry 2 O US echocardiography fet...

متن کامل

ACR appropriateness criteria radiologic management of infected fluid collections.

The best management of infected fluid collections depends on a careful assessment of clinical and anatomic factors as well as an up-to-date review of the published literature, to be able to select from a host of multidisciplinary treatment options. This article reviews conservative, radiologic, endoscopic, and surgical options and their best application to infected fluid collections as determin...

متن کامل

بررسی بهره برداری مناسب از سی تی اسکن در بخش های تریاژ

Background: Regarding to the importance of controlling health care expenditure, necessity for proper distribution of health care resources and appropriate utilization of hospital resources through inappropriate services reduction for patients, this study aimed to assess suitability of brain CT scans, based on American College of Radiologists (ACR) appropriateness criteria in Shahid Beheshti Hos...

متن کامل

Improved quality of life after 1 year with an invasive versus a noninvasive treatment strategy in claudicants: one-year results of the Invasive Revascularization or Not in Intermittent Claudication (IRONIC) Trial.

BACKGROUND The quality of evidence for invasive revascularization in intermittent claudication is low or very low. This prospective, randomized, controlled study tested the hypothesis that an invasive treatment strategy versus continued noninvasive treatment improves health-related quality of life after 1 year in unselected patients with intermittent claudication. METHODS AND RESULTS After cl...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR

دوره 14 5S  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017